KAMIESBERG

Ward 1: 2 of 4 voting districts inWard 2: not in yetWard 3: not in yetWard 5: 1 of 2 voting districts inWard 4: not in yetWard 6: 1 of 2 voting districts in
Partly counted 3No results, yet
Dashed: 2016 Ward 4 (2016 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 721 of 23 696 voting districts in (7.3%)checked Latest results
KAMIESBERG12 of 16 voting districts in3 of 6 wards complete

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did KAMIESBERG vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in KAMIESBERG ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power34hours off4 outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May: 0 hours off0MayJun: 0 hours off0JunJul · Power: 9 hours offJul: 9 hours off9JulAug: 0 hours off0AugSep · Power: 10 hours offSep: 10 hours off10SepOct · Power: 14 hours offOct: 14 hours off14Oct

2016 Ward 4, KAMIESBERG in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 6

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Results are not shown because IEC figures did not reconcile: ward ballot valid 884 + spoilt 3 != cast 145; ward ballot valid 752 + spoilt 38 != cast 479. We report this rather than guess.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 12 voting districts with results so far here (3 678 of 5 528). The IEC publishes 66.6%.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 10873 differs from the sum of party rows 13303 by 2430; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (382); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 377 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1054); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 326 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (996); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 392 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (380); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 650 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1972); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (380); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1335: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 506 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1069); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 350 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (787); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 142 differs from the sum of party rows 884 by 742; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 300 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (936); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 295 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (909); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1616: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1621: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 441 differs from the sum of party rows 752 by 311; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:50 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it