GA-SEGONYANA

Ward 1: not in yetWard 2: not in yetWard 3: not in yetWard 4: 1 of 4 voting districts in, ANC 39.0% so farWard 5: not in yetWard 6: 1 of 4 voting districts in, SACP 43.2% so farWard 7: not in yetWard 8: 1 of 5 voting districts in, ANC 40.9% so farWard 10: not in yetWard 11: 5 of 7 voting districts in, DA 34.1% so farWard 12: not in yetWard 13: not in yetWard 14: not in yetWard 15: not in yetWard 9: not in yet
WardsANC 2SACP 1DA 1Partly counted 4No results, yetdarker = bigger win
Dashed: 2021 Ward 9 (2021 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too
200020062011201620212026

ANC 29.5%

Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · Ward ballot
  • ANC 29.5%
  • SACP 21.3%
  • DA 14.6%
  • Others 34.6%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 911 of 23 696 voting districts in (8.1%)checked Latest results
GA-SEGONYANA8 of 48 voting districts in0 of 15 wards complete
Turnout so far58.4%
Voters on the roll so far1 374

Ward ballot ? · 789 valid votes

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did GA-SEGONYANA vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in GA-SEGONYANA ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power13hours off2 outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May: 0 hours off0MayJun: 0 hours off0JunJul: 0 hours off0JulAug · Power: 6 hours offAug: 6 hours off6AugSep: 0 hours off0SepOct · Power: 7 hours offOct: 7 hours off7Oct

2021 Ward 9, GA-SEGONYANA in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 15

On EskomSePush

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 28 · 8 of 48 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 8 voting districts with results so far here (802 of 1 374). The IEC publishes 58.5%.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1744: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (362); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1623: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1922: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 04:05 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it