ANC 43.3%
Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)
- ANC 43.3%
- ActionSA 18.2%
- EFF 10.1%
- Others 28.5%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 32 813 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress14 21043.3%
ActionSA5 96518.2%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters3 29910.1%- AINDCAfrican Independent National Democratic Caucus2 5207.7%
DADemocratic Alliance1 7865.4%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus9873.0%- SACPSouth African Communist Party7312.2%
UCDPUnited Christian Democratic Party6662.0%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party5441.7%
PAPatriotic Alliance5331.6%- LABOURLabour Party of South Africa4881.5%
- IndependentIndependent candidates2520.8%
FFDForum for Democrats2260.7%- Bophuthatswana Civil MovementBophuthatswana Civil Movement1590.5%
- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement1480.5%
- ASMAfrican Spear Movement970.3%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania810.2%- AACUMActive African Christians United Movement530.2%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party450.1%- AAAICArise Afrika Arise Independent Congress230.1%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did Ramotshere Moiloa vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in Ramotshere Moiloa ?
Reported in the ESP app
2000 Ward 1, Zeerust in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 19
- Ward 2ANC 49.3%
- Ward 3ActionSA 48.1%
- Ward 4ANC 49.0%
- Ward 6ANC 48.0%
- Ward 15 of 7 voting districts inANC 47.1%
- Ward 55 of 7 voting districts inEFF 41.6%
- Ward 75 of 8 voting districts inANC 37.0%
- Ward 86 of 7 voting districts inANC 44.1%
- Ward 94 of 6 voting districts inANC 33.0%
- Ward 104 of 5 voting districts inANC 52.3%
- Ward 113 of 4 voting districts inANC 44.3%
- Ward 123 of 4 voting districts inANC 73.9%
- Ward 133 of 5 voting districts inANC 36.6%
- Ward 144 of 5 voting districts inANC 47.5%
- Ward 154 of 5 voting districts inANC 43.1%
- Ward 162 of 3 voting districts inVF PLUS 37.5%
- Ward 179 of 11 voting districts inANC 39.0%
- Ward 182 of 3 voting districts inANC 37.0%
- Ward 194 of 6 voting districts inANC 42.0%
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 2 734 · 87 of 110 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 87 voting districts with results so far here (26 912 of 55 989). The IEC publishes 46.4%.
Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 637 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2214); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 497 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1683); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (397); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2130: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 832 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2583); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2130: the IEC's cross-ballot total 420 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (828); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (359); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 905 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2667); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 726 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2132); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2130: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 858 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2549); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 382 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1122); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 175 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (523); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (332); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2130: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 463 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1240); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 383 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1270); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (612); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2130: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 967 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2831); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (764); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (491); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 134 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (431); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2130: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 911 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2846); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 731 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2292); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 448 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (873); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 217 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (663); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2130: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1031 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2959); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2130: the IEC's cross-ballot total 811 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1619); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (552); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (454); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 257 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (831); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (578); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (393); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2130: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 552 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1763); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2130: the IEC's cross-ballot total 227 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (437); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (323); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 447 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1375); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2130: the IEC's cross-ballot total 212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (398); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (579); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 879 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2632); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (249); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2130: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 617 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1866); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 371 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1120); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (706); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (392); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (381); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2130: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1710: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 950 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2857); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 263 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (802); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (748); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (689); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (351); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2130: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 877 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2633); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 702 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2120); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (351); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (252); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2130: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3244: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 554 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1641); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (874); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (798); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (629); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2130: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 345 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1134); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 144 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (361); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (471); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2130: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (197); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (374); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (392); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2182: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 408 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1385); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 133 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (593); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (381); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (292); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (294); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2130: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1532: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (570); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (354); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2130: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:50 SAST.