ANC 50.7%
Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)
- ANC 50.7%
- EFF 14.2%
- SACP 13.8%
- Others 21.4%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 1 496 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress75850.7%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters21214.2%- SACPSouth African Communist Party20613.8%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1228.2%
DADemocratic Alliance553.7%
ActionSA553.7%- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement281.9%
PAPatriotic Alliance271.8%
UATUnited Africans Transformation191.3%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party100.7%
SAPASouth African Political Association30.2%- IndependentIndependent candidates10.1%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did Mamusa vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in Mamusa ?
Reported in the ESP app
2006 Ward 4, Mamusa in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 8
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 298 · 8 of 25 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 8 voting districts with results so far here (1 496 of 3 281). The IEC publishes 46.4%.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (624); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 430 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1286); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (446); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (393); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:41 SAST.