ANC 72.3%
Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)
- ANC 72.3%
- EFF 11.2%
- DA 9.5%
- Others 6.9%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 535 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress38772.3%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters6011.2%
DADemocratic Alliance519.5%
UCDPUnited Christian Democratic Party91.7%- SACPSouth African Communist Party91.7%
ActionSA71.3%- RASAReform Alliance of South Africa61.1%
- ACTAfrican Congress for Transformation40.7%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party20.4%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did Kagisano-Molopo vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in Kagisano-Molopo ?
Reported in the ESP app
2011 Ward 15, NW397 Local Municipality in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 15
- Ward 11 of 7 voting districts inDA 88.6%
- Ward 22 of 11 voting districts inTied
- Ward 61 of 4 voting districts inANC 79.8%
- Ward 81 of 7 voting districts inANC 82.0%
- Ward 3Not in yet
- Ward 4Not in yet
- Ward 5Not in yet
- Ward 7Not in yet
- Ward 9Not in yet
- Ward 10Not in yet
- Ward 11Not in yet
- Ward 12Not in yet
- Ward 13Not in yet
- Ward 14Not in yet
- Ward 15Not in yet
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 16 · 5 of 91 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 5 voting districts with results so far here (547 of 1 405). The IEC publishes 38.9%.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (854); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (279); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 04:03 SAST.