Greater Taung

special votes 7 070 · All 130 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 130 voting districts here (52 793 of 99 716). The IEC publishes 53.4%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 862 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2604); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 721 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 320 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (940); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (302); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2024: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 982 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2966); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 634 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1883); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 293 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (812); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2024: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1253 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3832); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (684); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (635); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2024: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 839 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2679); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 609 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1891); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 350 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (629); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (310); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2024: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 341 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (947); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (752); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (636); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (455); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2024: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 991 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3024); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 344 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1017); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 301 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (913); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 234 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (664); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2024: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1059 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 452 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 395 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 259 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (766); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2024: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 869 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 377 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1444); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 283 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1012); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (494); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (220); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2024: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1046 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3242); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 448 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1339); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (675); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (293); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2024: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1214 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3612); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 350 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1036); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 221 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (721); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2024: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 653 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2033); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 507 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1520); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (290); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2024: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1046 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3256); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 385 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1166); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (650); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (535); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2024: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 825 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2547); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2024: the IEC's cross-ballot total 471 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (750); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (799); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 183 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (670); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 112 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 815 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2523); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 250 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (775); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (624); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (404); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2024: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 701 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (815); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (478); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (325); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2024: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 731 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 368 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 327 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (968); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2024: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1291 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3913); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 460 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1364); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (662); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (269); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3582); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 678 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2010); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (595); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (331); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2024: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3450); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 376 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1134); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 339 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1016); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (327); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 762 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2326); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 609 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1812); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (585); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (503); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (296); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (227); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2024: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 867 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2661); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 372 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1073); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 215 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (630); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (559); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 823 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2566); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 477 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1423); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 472 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1386); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 169 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (528); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3312); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 302 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (896); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (839); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (450); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (369); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2024: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3427); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (291); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1979: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1484: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2024: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1963: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 14:50 SAST.