WardsSDP 3Partly counted 3No results, yetdarker = bigger win

Dashed: 2021 Ward 1 (2021 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

SDP 45.3%

Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · Ward ballot

SDP 45.3%
ANC 32.9%
OLH 4.4%
Others 17.4%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 911 of 23 696 voting districts in (8.1%)checked 04:14Latest results

Victor Khanye10 of 30 voting districts in0 of 9 wards complete

Turnout so far47.7%

Voters on the roll so far5 771

Ward ballot ? · 2 675 valid votes

SDPService Delivery Party1 21345.3%
ANCAfrican National Congress87932.9%
OLHOur Last Hope1174.4%
DADemocratic Alliance1104.1%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters1104.1%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus923.4%
AICAfrican Independent Congress521.9%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party431.6%
ActionSA240.9%
SACPSouth African Communist Party200.7%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement90.3%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania30.1%
SPPSindawonye Progressive Party20.1%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement10.0%

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Victor Khanye vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Victor Khanye ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power348hours off34 outages

Water11hours off1 outage

Internet0hours offNo outages

2021 Ward 1, Victor Khanye in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Ward 1All of 2021 ward 1

Wards · 9

On EskomSePush

Victor KhanyePower, water or internet off? Live reports near you

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 680 · 11 of 30 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 11 voting districts with results so far here (2 754 of 5 771). The IEC publishes 47.9%.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (384); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (222); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 859 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2485); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 599 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1853); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (272); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (237); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1929: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2053: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2048: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1075: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1004: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (871); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1770: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 29: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2058: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1619: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1483: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 04:03 SAST.