Lekwa

Ward 2: not in yetWard 3: not in yetWard 4: 1 of 2 voting districts in, ILP 51.7% so farWard 5: not in yetWard 6: not in yetWard 7: not in yetWard 8: not in yetWard 9: 2 of 7 voting districts in, ANC 29.9% so farWard 10: not in yetWard 11: not in yetWard 12: 2 of 6 voting districts in, ANC 40.7% so farWard 13: 1 of 4 voting districts in, ANC 37.1% so farWard 14: not in yetWard 15: not in yetWard 1: not in yet
WardsANC 3ILP 1Partly counted 4No results, yetdarker = bigger win
Dashed: 2021 Ward 1 (2021 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too
200020062011201620212026

ILP 41.0%

Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · Ward ballot
  • ILP 41.0%
  • VF PLUS 20.9%
  • DA 14.0%
  • Others 24.2%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting980 of 23 696 voting districts in (4.1%)checked Latest results
Lekwa6 of 43 voting districts in0 of 15 wards complete
Turnout so far57.0%
Voters on the roll so far3 164

Ward ballot ? · 1 769 valid votes

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Lekwa vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Lekwa ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power66hours off7 outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May · Power: 47 hours offMay: 47 hours off47MayJun: 0 hours off0JunJul · Power: 6 hours offJul: 6 hours off6JulAug: 0 hours off0AugSep · Power: 13 hours offSep: 13 hours off13SepOct: 0 hours off0Oct

2021 Ward 1, Lekwa in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 15

On EskomSePush

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 10 · 6 of 43 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 6 voting districts with results so far here (1 802 of 3 164). The IEC publishes 57.0%.

Note: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 713 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1826); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 287 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (934); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (772); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 649: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1600: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1889: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 02:29 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it