Dr Pixley Ka Isaka Seme

Ward 1: not in yetWard 2: not in yetWard 3: not in yetWard 5: not in yetWard 7: 1 of 5 voting districts in, ANC 39.7% so farWard 8: not in yetWard 9: 1 of 3 voting districts in, ANC 51.4% so farWard 10: 1 of 7 voting districts in, ANC 41.9% so farWard 11: not in yetWard 4: not in yetWard 6: 1 of 6 voting districts in, ANC 40.3% so far
WardsANC 4Partly counted 4No results, yetdarker = bigger win
Dashed: 2000 Ward 10 (2000 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too
200020062011201620212026

ANC 43.4%

Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · Ward ballot
  • ANC 43.4%
  • MKP 24.8%
  • DA 12.4%
  • Others 19.4%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 114 of 23 696 voting districts in (4.7%)checked Latest results
Dr Pixley Ka Isaka Seme4 of 44 voting districts in0 of 11 wards complete
Turnout so far40.1%
Voters on the roll so far1 043

Ward ballot ? · 412 valid votes

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Dr Pixley Ka Isaka Seme vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Dr Pixley Ka Isaka Seme ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power33hours off3 outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May: 0 hours off0MayJun: 0 hours off0JunJul: 0 hours off0JulAug: 0 hours off0AugSep · Power: 33 hours offSep: 33 hours off33SepOct: 0 hours off0Oct

2000 Ward 10, Seme in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 11

On EskomSePush

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 35 · 4 of 44 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 4 voting districts with results so far here (418 of 1 043). The IEC publishes 40.1%.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1035: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 02:47 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it