Bushbuckridge

Results are not shown because IEC figures did not reconcile: ward ballot valid 367 + spoilt 0 != cast 0. We report this rather than guess.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 12 voting districts with results so far here (2 430 of 6 254). The IEC publishes 44.7%.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 269 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (829); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (931); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 261 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (793); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 0 differs from the sum of party rows 367 by 367; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (610); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 651: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1606: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 403 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (958); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2100: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1107: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (598); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1935: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 301 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (888); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (286); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: the IEC's published turnout for this municipality is 44.68%; its own counts give 38.86% (PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in its voting districts); we show the calculated figure.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 04:04 SAST.