uPhongolo

Get the app
Ward 1: IFP 44.3%Ward 2: MKP 36.5%Ward 3: IFP 37.4%Ward 4: IFP 38.7%Ward 5: ANC 35.8%Ward 6: IFP 42.8%Ward 7: ANC 48.7%Ward 8: IFP 54.4%Ward 9: MKP 35.8%Ward 10: ANC 31.9%Ward 11: IFP 37.2%Ward 12: ANC 36.2%Ward 14: IFP 32.5%Ward 15: IFP 47.5%Ward 13: IFP 39.4%
WardsIFP 9ANC 4MKP 2darker = bigger win
Dashed: 2021 Ward 13 (2021 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

No majority

IFP 10 of 29 seats · 15 for a majority

Most ward votes: IFP 35.0%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

uPhongoloAll 82 voting districts in
All 15 wards complete
Turnout54.9%
Voters on the roll73 357
South Africa · Counting23 627 of 23 696 voting districts in (99.7%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 39 979 valid votes

Council seats · 29 ?

  1. Inkatha Freedom Party9 ward · 1 PR10
  2. African National Congress4 ward · 4 PR8
  3. Umkhonto Wesizwe Party2 ward · 6 PR8
  4. Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
  5. Democratic Alliance0 ward · 1 PR1
  6. National Freedom Party0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in uPhongolo ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power0hours offNo outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages

2021 Ward 13, uPhongolo in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 15

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 3 895 · All 82 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 82 voting districts here (40 295 of 73 357). The IEC publishes 55.1%.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1040 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1032 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3074); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (431); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1592: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1068 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 766 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 615 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1944); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (582); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1592: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1029 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3086); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 706 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2080); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 598 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1777); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 280 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (912); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1592: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 974 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2946); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 884 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2704); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 477 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1592: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 882 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2671); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 780 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2316); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 683 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2065); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1592: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3749); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1236 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3625); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 354 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1101); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1592: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1550 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4393); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 852 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2751); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 597 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1870); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1592: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1382 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4034); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 572 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1947); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (824); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1592: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1067 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1016 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3010); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 593 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1720); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1592: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 889 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2666); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 870 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2918); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 477 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1564); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (349); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1592: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1221 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3557); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 694 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2041); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 481 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1709); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 300 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1030); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (537); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (558); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1592: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 858 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2549); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 846 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2499); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 433 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1360); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (188); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1592: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 911 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2717); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 673 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2045); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 437 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1334); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (210); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1592: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 741 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2190); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 718 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 565 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1685); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (268); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (248); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1592: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3300); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 697 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2079); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 384 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2177: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1701: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1592: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 07 Nov 2026, 12:33 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it