No majority
MKP 27 of 71 seats · 36 for a majority
Most ward votes: MKP 36.8%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 113 517 valid votes
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party41 80736.8%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party27 88624.6%
ANCAfrican National Congress19 98217.6%
DADemocratic Alliance13 32811.7%
ActionSA2 2502.0%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters2 2182.0%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1 6441.4%
NFPNational Freedom Party1 0550.9%- IndependentIndependent candidates6870.6%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party5510.5%- SACPSouth African Communist Party5160.5%
- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement2900.3%
IAIndependent Alliance2300.2%- AMC.ROY.African Movement Congress2090.2%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement1890.2%
NPANational Peoples Ambassadors1690.1%
ACCActive Citizens Coalition1400.1%- AEFAfrican Economic Freedom1020.1%
- CCUCongregational Christian Unity740.1%
- ARM.JBSAfrican Restoration Movement710.1%
UCDPUnited Christian Democratic Party580.1%- GJDPGods Justice and Development Party480.0%
ARUAfrican Renaissance Unity130.0%
Council seats · 71 ?
- Umkhonto Wesizwe Party23 ward · 4 PR27
- Inkatha Freedom Party6 ward · 12 PR18
- African National Congress2 ward · 10 PR12
- Democratic Alliance5 ward · 4 PR9
- ActionSA0 ward · 2 PR2
- Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
- National Freedom Party0 ward · 1 PR1
- Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
Hours off in uMhlathuze ?
Reported in the ESP app
2006 Ward 26 in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 36
- Ward 1DA 30.5%
- Ward 2DA 68.9%
- Ward 3DA 60.5%
- Ward 4MKP 52.7%
- Ward 5IFP 30.4%
- Ward 6ANC 34.9%
- Ward 7MKP 41.3%
- Ward 8MKP 43.0%
- Ward 9MKP 33.6%
- Ward 10MKP 39.7%
- Ward 11IFP 39.0%
- Ward 12MKP 43.3%
- Ward 13IFP 37.8%
- Ward 14MKP 29.1%
- Ward 15MKP 41.0%
- Ward 16MKP 51.6%
- Ward 17MKP 51.1%
- Ward 18MKP 43.4%
- Ward 19MKP 34.3%
- Ward 20MKP 46.5%
- Ward 21MKP 45.1%
- Ward 22ANC 54.1%
- Ward 23DA 46.5%
- Ward 24MKP 48.8%
- Ward 25MKP 53.7%
- Ward 26IFP 40.9%
- Ward 27MKP 35.1%
- Ward 28MKP 46.6%
- Ward 29IFP 47.0%
- Ward 30MKP 41.5%
- Ward 31MKP 50.7%
- Ward 32MKP 52.3%
- Ward 33IFP 48.4%
- Ward 34MKP 27.2%
- Ward 35DA 58.8%
- Ward 36MKP 36.7%
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 7 005 · All 145 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 145 voting districts here (114 717 of 218 080). The IEC publishes 52.8%.
Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3295); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1044 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3175); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 797 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2274); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1101); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 188 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (536); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (141); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (160); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 1: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1494 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4304); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (718); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (630); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6310); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 511 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1661); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 409 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1158); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (702); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (437); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (204); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 3: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1636 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4916); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 857 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2539); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 288 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (832); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1012 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3120); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 637 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2361); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 560 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1722); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 552 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1597); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (496); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 5: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3278); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1083 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3282); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 784 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2498); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 6: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3782); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1229 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3646); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 283 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (844); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 7: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1084 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3266); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 769 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2450); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 507 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1437); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (159); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 8: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3555); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 942 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2781); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 647 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2007); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 414 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1168); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (302); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 93 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (300); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 9: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3759); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 984 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2965); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 524 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1509); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3138); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 974 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3128); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 526 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1469); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (265); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1993 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6102); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1301 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3894); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 748 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2235); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (442); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (228); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1040 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3121); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1007 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3037); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 501 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1522); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 717 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2312); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 561 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1575); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 530 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1536); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 528 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1608); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 14: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3603); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 478 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1377); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 434 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1366); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 362 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1125); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 111 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (347); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (293); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (318); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 15: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1313 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3972); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 436 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1275); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 358 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1049); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (530); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (338); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 16: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1616 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4914); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 584 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1551); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 504 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1531); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (720); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (363); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1595 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4881); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1009 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2798); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 788 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2332); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (353); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 18: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 960 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3137); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 602 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1624); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 592 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1793); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 442 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1207); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 19: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1508 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4703); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 768 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1979); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 614 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1859); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (679); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (169); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3905); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 779 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1678); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1203); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (371); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2029 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5132); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1023 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4205); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 480 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1588); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1399 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3869); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 698 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2187); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 342 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1175); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 299 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (890); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (330); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1794 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5455); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 725 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2230); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 704 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1937); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (392); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 108 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (332); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 105 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1818 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5525); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 768 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2102); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 542 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1573); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 25: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1452 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3494); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 973 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3768); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 628 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1910); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 244 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (677); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (389); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3956); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1145 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3455); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 718 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1865); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (146); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (189); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1622 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5193); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1028 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2441); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 648 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2054); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (239); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (192); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1891 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5610); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1839 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5375); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (609); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 967 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3308); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 383 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1179); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 322 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1122); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (382); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1521 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4577); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 844 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2541); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 542 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1552); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (134); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1758 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5305); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1001 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2999); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 492 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1440); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1439 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4318); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3452); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (723); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 33: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 359 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1147); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 327 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (878); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 272 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (812); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (561); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 126 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (365); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2066 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6011); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 486 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1553); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 351 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1075); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (838); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (524); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (254); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1255 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3856); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 864 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2529); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 757 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2216); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (784); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (403); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1565: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 2112: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 36: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 07 Nov 2026, 07:23 SAST.