IFP 77.0%
Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)
- IFP 77.0%
- MKP 11.4%
- NPA 4.2%
- Others 7.3%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 1 084 valid votes
IFPInkatha Freedom Party83577.0%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party12411.4%
NPANational Peoples Ambassadors464.2%
ANCAfrican National Congress312.9%
NFPNational Freedom Party201.8%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters131.2%
DADemocratic Alliance111.0%
NAPFNational People's Front10.1%
IAIndependent Alliance10.1%- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement10.1%
- GJDPGods Justice and Development Party10.1%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did Ulundi vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in Ulundi ?
Reported in the ESP app
2006 Ward 5 in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 25
- Ward 41 of 7 voting districts inIFP 91.7%
- Ward 162 of 6 voting districts inIFP 74.8%
- Ward 191 of 7 voting districts inIFP 56.9%
- Ward 201 of 6 voting districts inIFP 86.4%
- Ward 1Not in yet
- Ward 2Not in yet
- Ward 3Not in yet
- Ward 5Not in yet
- Ward 6Not in yet
- Ward 7Not in yet
- Ward 8Not in yet
- Ward 9Not in yet
- Ward 10Not in yet
- Ward 11Not in yet
- Ward 12Not in yet
- Ward 13Not in yet
- Ward 14Not in yet
- Ward 15Not in yet
- Ward 17Not in yet
- Ward 18Not in yet
- Ward 21Not in yet
- Ward 22Not in yet
- Ward 23Not in yet
- Ward 24Not in yet
- Ward 25Not in yet
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 52 · 5 of 151 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 5 voting districts with results so far here (1 093 of 2 336). The IEC publishes 46.8%.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 222 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (441); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (662); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1846: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (459); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1307: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 235 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (698); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 04:03 SAST.