Ndwedwe

special votes 3 169 · All 110 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 110 voting districts here (46 995 of 81 946). The IEC publishes 57.5%.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 863 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2689); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 700 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2083); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 340 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1058); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (252); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1869: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4094); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 751 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2199); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (348); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1869: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1446 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4361); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 857 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2558); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 224 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (688); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (262); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1869: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1224 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3664); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 664 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2001); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (350); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1869: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 657 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2048); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 639 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1979); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 579 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1586); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 219 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (674); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1869: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3485); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 468 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1434); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 338 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (413); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (262); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 842 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2554); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 762 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 311 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (903); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1869: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1204 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3598); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1063 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (243); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1869: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1034 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3139); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 530 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1591); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 458 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1372); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1869: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 965 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2891); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 512 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1552); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 394 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (498); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (191); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1869: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1142 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3533); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1058 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 954 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2805); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (184); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1869: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1259 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3841); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1020 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3021); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (765); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (505); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 918 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2823); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 488 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1314); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 478 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1492); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 462 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1349); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (209); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1869: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1392 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 601 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1791); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 516 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1482); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 319 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (921); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1869: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 941 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2870); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 582 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1776); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 415 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1869: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 974 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2929); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 675 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2034); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 618 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1882); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 242 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (716); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1869: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3509); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 634 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1966); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 394 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1097); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1869: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1024 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 724 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2376); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 314 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1078); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (528); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1869: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 798 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 677 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2027); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 422 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1353); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1543: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1927: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 07 Nov 2026, 07:23 SAST.