No majority
MKP 31 of 81 seats · 41 for a majority
Most ward votes: MKP 38.1%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 202 725 valid votes
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party77 30538.1%
ANCAfrican National Congress41 95020.7%
DADemocratic Alliance41 14420.3%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party16 2708.0%- INDIndependent Councillors7 3073.6%
- IndependentIndependent candidates3 0191.5%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters2 3491.2%
ActionSA2 1801.1%- SACPSouth African Communist Party1 3660.7%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1 1390.6%
AICAfrican Independent Congress9200.5%- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement9150.5%
PAPatriotic Alliance8300.4%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement6340.3%- A.B.C.D.Abantu Bezwelethu Congress Democracy6270.3%
- TRUTHTruth and Solidarity Movement5490.3%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party5260.3%
KZNIKzn Independence4360.2%
ALJAMAAl Jama-ah3930.2%
NFPNational Freedom Party3510.2%
MFMinority Front3430.2%
AMSAActivists Movement of South Africa2630.1%
JEPJustice and Employment Party2240.1%- AMC.ROY.African Movement Congress2170.1%
- NGGNext Generation Government1860.1%
- B.M.Bumbana Mzansi1860.1%
ACCActive Citizens Coalition1620.1%
ARUAfrican Renaissance Unity1480.1%
APEMOAfrican People's Movement1440.1%
ABCAbantu Batho Congress1260.1%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania1210.1%
AZAPOAzanian People's Organisation1150.1%- AFNAAfro Natives1120.1%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement750.0%- UMUnity Mzanse550.0%
- MA AFRIKAAfrika Unite Congress200.0%
SAFSouth Africa First180.0%
Council seats · 81 ?
- Umkhonto Wesizwe Party23 ward · 8 PR31
- African National Congress1 ward · 16 PR17
- Democratic Alliance11 ward · 6 PR17
- Inkatha Freedom Party2 ward · 5 PR7
- Independent Councillors3 ward · 0 PR3
- Vryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus0 ward · 1 PR1
- South African Communist Party0 ward · 1 PR1
- Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1
- ActionSA0 ward · 1 PR1
- Afrika Mayibuye Movement0 ward · 1 PR1
Hours off in Msunduzi ?
Reported in the ESP app
2016 Ward 25, Msunduzi in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 41
- Ward 2IFP 31.6%
- Ward 4MKP 57.3%
- Ward 10MKP 60.8%
- Ward 11MKP 51.2%
- Ward 12MKP 43.2%
- Ward 17MKP 57.1%
- Ward 20MKP 58.6%
- Ward 21MKP 47.1%
- Ward 22MKP 50.3%
- Ward 23MKP 60.8%
- Ward 24MKP 38.1%
- Ward 26DA 72.0%
- Ward 27DA 34.3%
- Ward 28DA 66.2%
- Ward 29MKP 38.7%
- Ward 30DA 39.0%
- Ward 31DA 67.7%
- Ward 32DA 48.1%
- Ward 34Independent 32.8%
- Ward 35DA 29.0%
- Ward 37DA 69.7%
- Ward 38MKP 42.5%
- Ward 40IFP 34.9%
- Ward 1Not in yet
- Ward 3Not in yet
- Ward 5Not in yet
- Ward 6Not in yet
- Ward 7Not in yet
- Ward 8Not in yet
- Ward 9Not in yet
- Ward 13Not in yet
- Ward 14Not in yet
- Ward 15Not in yet
- Ward 16Not in yet
- Ward 18Not in yet
- Ward 19Not in yet
- Ward 25Not in yet
- Ward 33Not in yet
- Ward 36Not in yet
- Ward 39Not in yet
- Ward 41Not in yet
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 8 449 · All 240 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 240 voting districts here (205 771 of 366 266). The IEC publishes 56.5%.
Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1492 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4379); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1057 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3235); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 878 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2445); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 715 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1713); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 311 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1185); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 2: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2712 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8159); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 890 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2642); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 351 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1035); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 326 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (962); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 4: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2823 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8440); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3369); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 332 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1039); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (269); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 10: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3061 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10320); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1054 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3375); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 211 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (830); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (607); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (489); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (455); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (179); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 11: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1841 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6071); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1600 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4627); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (503); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (395); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (241); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 12: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3172 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9520); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1386 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3885); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 372 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1264); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (483); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (332); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (317); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 17: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2719 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8309); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1402 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3970); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (802); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (270); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 20: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2209 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6782); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1786 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5548); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (380); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (265); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2449 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7505); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1441 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4154); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 262 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (780); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (394); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 137 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (359); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (328); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 103 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (283); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 22: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2809 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8366); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1051 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3111); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 176 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (522); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (476); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (568); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 23: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6450); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1465 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4876); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1238 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2854); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 243 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (908); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 177 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (595); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (199); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (166); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 24: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3966 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11471); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 738 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2373); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 224 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (727); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 180 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (623); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (392); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (314); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 26: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1074 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3303); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1021 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3079); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 430 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1274); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 155 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (465); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (376); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 27: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3468 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10823); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 561 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1348); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 491 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1381); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (909); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 28: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1528 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4716); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 945 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2859); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 519 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1529); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 475 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1206); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (728); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 29: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2345 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6986); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1509 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4654); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1393 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4224); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 331 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1034); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 30: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3276 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9985); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 544 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1399); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 361 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1093); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 258 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (876); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (178); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 31: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2542 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7945); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1509 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4423); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 639 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1946); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (416); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (388); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 32: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1088 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3656); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1036 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4687); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 440 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1448); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (306); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (250); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (262); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (244); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 34: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1658 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4972); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1620 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4976); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1562 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4780); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (747); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (471); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (208); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 35: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3377 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9826); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 552 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1814); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 448 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1487); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (281); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (225); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (180); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 37: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1766 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5461); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1006 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3077); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 374 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1215); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 349 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1019); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 348 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (943); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 2193: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 38: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1569 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4606); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1453 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4483); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 752 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2166); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 377 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1336); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 2006: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (267); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 64 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (186); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1526: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1473: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1286: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 2134: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 3205: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 2133: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1703: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1528: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 31: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1488: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: ward 40: party 1391: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 07 Nov 2026, 20:31 SAST.