DA 39.8%
Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)
- DA 39.8%
- ANC 29.1%
- PA 5.8%
- Others 25.3%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
Ward ballot ? · 10 693 valid votes
DADemocratic Alliance4 25139.8%
ANCAfrican National Congress3 11529.1%
PAPatriotic Alliance6255.8%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters5675.3%- Mayibuye Civic MovementMayibuye Civic Movement2752.6%
ActionSA1991.9%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus1831.7%
UDMUnited Democratic Movement1831.7%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party1711.6%- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement1711.6%
- IndependentIndependent candidates1431.3%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement1061.0%- SACPSouth African Communist Party1051.0%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party860.8%- DMDemocratic Movement850.8%
- DOPDefenders of the People740.7%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania440.4%
AICAfrican Independent Congress420.4%
GOOD390.4%
ALJAMAAl Jama-ah360.3%- E.T.MEighteen Twelve Movement320.3%
- NANational Alliance300.3%
- UPPAUnited Progressive People Alliance210.2%
AZAPOAzanian People's Organisation200.2%- P.PPeople's Power170.2%
APCAfrican People's Convention150.1%
COPECongress of the People120.1%- AIMAbantu Integrity Movement100.1%
- PCAMProgressive Community Alliance Movement100.1%
OHMOrganic Humanity Movement50.0%- SWOSibanye (We Are One)50.0%
ECOFORUMEconomic Emancipation Forum30.0%
ACPAll Citizens Party30.0%- FISAFreedom in South Africa30.0%
- CKPChrist Kingdom Party30.0%
- APPEIRAfrican Peoples Progression20.0%
- LABOURLabour Party of South Africa20.0%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did Nelson Mandela Bay vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in Nelson Mandela Bay ?
Reported in the ESP app
2021 Ward 13, Nelson Mandela Bay in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 60
- Ward 41 of 4 voting districts inANC 44.8%
- Ward 171 of 6 voting districts inANC 52.6%
- Ward 251 of 4 voting districts inANC 52.5%
- Ward 271 of 5 voting districts inANC 45.2%
- Ward 311 of 4 voting districts inDA 63.1%
- Ward 321 of 5 voting districts inDA 73.9%
- Ward 351 of 6 voting districts inDA 70.6%
- Ward 401 of 8 voting districts inDA 92.3%
- Ward 431 of 4 voting districts inANC 49.3%
- Ward 452 of 7 voting districts inANC 35.6%
- Ward 492 of 5 voting districts inDA 72.1%
- Ward 502 of 5 voting districts inDA 46.0%
- Ward 532 of 6 voting districts inANC 61.0%
- Ward 571 of 4 voting districts inANC 59.3%
- Ward 1Not in yet
- Ward 2Not in yet
- Ward 3Not in yet
- Ward 5Not in yet
- Ward 6Not in yet
- Ward 7Not in yet
- Ward 8Not in yet
- Ward 9Not in yet
- Ward 10Not in yet
- Ward 11Not in yet
- Ward 12Not in yet
- Ward 13Not in yet
- Ward 14Not in yet
- Ward 15Not in yet
- Ward 16Not in yet
- Ward 18Not in yet
- Ward 19Not in yet
- Ward 20Not in yet
- Ward 21Not in yet
- Ward 22Not in yet
- Ward 23Not in yet
- Ward 24Not in yet
- Ward 26Not in yet
- Ward 28Not in yet
- Ward 29Not in yet
- Ward 30Not in yet
- Ward 33Not in yet
- Ward 34Not in yet
- Ward 36Not in yet
- Ward 37Not in yet
- Ward 38Not in yet
- Ward 39Not in yet
- Ward 41Not in yet
- Ward 42Not in yet
- Ward 44Not in yet
- Ward 46Not in yet
- Ward 47Not in yet
- Ward 48Not in yet
- Ward 51Not in yet
- Ward 52Not in yet
- Ward 54Not in yet
- Ward 55Not in yet
- Ward 56Not in yet
- Ward 58Not in yet
- Ward 59Not in yet
- Ward 60Not in yet
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 1 611 · 18 of 268 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 18 voting districts with results so far here (10 864 of 21 731). The IEC publishes 50.2%.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2067: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2098: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1538: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 447 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (909); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2098: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1538: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1757: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2067: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 444 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (875); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2098: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1538: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 276 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (561); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2098: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2158: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1538: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 154 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (313); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2184: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1874: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1051 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2156); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1874: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1500: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1906: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2098: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 345 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (694); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1874: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1906: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1500: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 408 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (800); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1874: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 378 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (766); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2098: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (345); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1538: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2067: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1362: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2158: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (480); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 206 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (411); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 72 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2098: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1538: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1500: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1072 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2102); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 223 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (441); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1500: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1906: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1874: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3255: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2098: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 687 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1395); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 364 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (719); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 226 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (443); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1368: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1906: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2098: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1757: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 100 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (203); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 582 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1180); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 115 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2098: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1874: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 2067: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1538: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1757: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1920: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 04:00 SAST.