Enoch Mgijima

Ward 1: not in yetWard 2: not in yetWard 3: not in yetWard 4: not in yetWard 5: not in yetWard 6: not in yetWard 7: not in yetWard 8: not in yetWard 9: not in yetWard 10: not in yetWard 11: not in yetWard 12: not in yetWard 13: not in yetWard 15: not in yetWard 16: not in yetWard 17: not in yetWard 18: not in yetWard 19: not in yetWard 20: not in yetWard 21: 1 of 9 voting districts in, ANC 92.7% so farWard 22: 3 of 11 voting districts in, ANC 61.1% so farWard 23: not in yetWard 24: 1 of 5 voting districts in, ANC 78.4% so farWard 25: not in yetWard 26: not in yetWard 27: not in yetWard 28: 1 of 6 voting districts in, DA 78.7% so farWard 29: 1 of 4 voting districts in, DA 44.6% so farWard 30: not in yetWard 31: not in yetWard 32: not in yetWard 33: not in yetWard 34: not in yetWard 14: not in yet
WardsANC 3DA 2Partly counted 5No results, yetdarker = bigger win
Dashed: 2021 Ward 14 (2021 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too
200020062011201620212026

DA 41.4%

Leading on the ward ballot so far (provisional)

Vote breakdown · Ward ballot
  • DA 41.4%
  • ANC 40.7%
  • EFF 4.5%
  • Others 13.4%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting510 of 23 696 voting districts in (2.2%)checked Latest results
Enoch Mgijima7 of 168 voting districts in0 of 34 wards complete
Turnout so far49.8%
Voters on the roll so far1 902

Ward ballot ? · 937 valid votes

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did Enoch Mgijima vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in Enoch Mgijima ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power66hours off9 outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May · Power: 33 hours offMay: 33 hours off33MayJun · Power: 6 hours offJun: 6 hours off6JunJul · Power: 6 hours offJul: 6 hours off6JulAug · Power: 8 hours offAug: 8 hours off8AugSep · Power: 6 hours offSep: 6 hours off6SepOct · Power: 7 hours offOct: 7 hours off7Oct

2021 Ward 14, Enoch Mgijima in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 34

On EskomSePush

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 77 · 7 of 168 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 7 voting districts with results so far here (948 of 1 902). The IEC publishes 49.9%.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 162 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (463); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1772: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (277); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 310 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (898); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1636: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 01:32 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it