Matlosana

special votes 15 661 · All 129 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 129 voting districts here (97 076 of 202 310). The IEC publishes 48.5%.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1381 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 376 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1051); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 247 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (775); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (323); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1666 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4655); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3751); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 362 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (640); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 160 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (483); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (615); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1294 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3842); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 680 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2017); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 289 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (877); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 210 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (644); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (252); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1918 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5608); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 750 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 590 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1856); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (694); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (274); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9355); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 673 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 187 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (578); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2049 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6023); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 549 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1681); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (617); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 83 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1312 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3942); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (756); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 197 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (603); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 132 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 110 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (198); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 688 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2065); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 258 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (766); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (507); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1442 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4308); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 251 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (725); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (480); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (331); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (333); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1888 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5773); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 420 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 334 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1008); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (427); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (183); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 817 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2446); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 173 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (526); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (449); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (221); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 997 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2987); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (845); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 234 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (710); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (480); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (296); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (427); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 25: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3281); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 462 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1394); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 447 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1285); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (470); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (427); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 871 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2622); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 404 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 376 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (502); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (427); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (287); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 29: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1589 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4441); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 885 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2885); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 201 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (591); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (165); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1043 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 266 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (779); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (415); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (263); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 32: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 969 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2903); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 444 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1252); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 168 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (497); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (252); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 34: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3598); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 350 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (957); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 193 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (591); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (569); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1795: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1349 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4070); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 505 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1511); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 241 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (757); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (289); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (216); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1924: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2765 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8074); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 643 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2037); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 258 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (797); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (251); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 326: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 39: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 07 Nov 2026, 13:02 SAST.