JB Marks

Ward 1: not in yetWard 2: 2 of 7 voting districts inWard 3: not in yetWard 4: 1 of 2 voting districts inWard 5: not in yetWard 6: not in yetWard 7: not in yetWard 8: not in yetWard 10: not in yetWard 11: 1 of 4 voting districts inWard 12: not in yetWard 13: not in yetWard 14: not in yetWard 15: not in yetWard 16: not in yetWard 17: not in yetWard 18: not in yetWard 19: not in yetWard 20: not in yetWard 21: not in yetWard 22: not in yetWard 23: not in yetWard 24: 1 of 2 voting districts inWard 25: 1 of 3 voting districts inWard 26: 1 of 4 voting districts inWard 27: 1 of 4 voting districts inWard 28: not in yetWard 29: not in yetWard 30: not in yetWard 31: not in yetWard 32: not in yetWard 33: not in yetWard 34: 2 of 12 voting districts inWard 9: not in yet
Partly counted 8No results, yet
Dashed: 2021 Ward 9 (2021 boundary) · Outlined: the 2026 wards covering it
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too
200020062011201620212026

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Counting1 721 of 23 696 voting districts in (7.3%)checked Latest results
JB Marks10 of 106 voting districts in0 of 34 wards complete

ESP app

How long is the queue?

Chat about the election in your area

Ask your area

ESP app

How did JB Marks vote?

Get notified when it's declared

Notify me

Hours off in JB Marks ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power1 955hours off166 outages
Water139hours off8 outages
Internet62hours off6 outages
May · Power: 361 hours offMay · Water: 7 hours offMay: 368 hours off368MayJun · Power: 226 hours offJun · Water: 111 hours offJun: 337 hours off337JunJul · Power: 250 hours offJul · Internet: 28 hours offJul: 278 hours off278JulAug · Power: 571 hours offAug · Internet: 28 hours offAug: 599 hours off599AugSep · Power: 245 hours offSep · Water: 15 hours offSep · Internet: 6 hours offSep: 266 hours off266SepOct · Power: 301 hours offOct · Water: 6 hours offOct: 307 hours off307Oct

2021 Ward 9, JB Marks in 2026 ?

No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.

Wards · 34

On EskomSePush

ESP's own data, not the IEC's.

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Results are not shown because IEC figures did not reconcile: ward ballot valid 776 + spoilt 8 != cast 617. We report this rather than guess.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 10 voting districts with results so far here (3 712 of 6 356). The IEC publishes 58.4%.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 10955 differs from the sum of party rows 11456 by 501; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 351 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1038); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (642); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 181 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (537); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 609 differs from the sum of party rows 776 by 167; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1093 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3215); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 375 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1377: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1971: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (351); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (103); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (653); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 149 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (389); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2079: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 178 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (545); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (298); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2090: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1711: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (118); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (275); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2028: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1559: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:50 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it