Elundini

Results are not shown because IEC figures did not reconcile: ward ballot valid 425 + spoilt 9 != cast 265; ward ballot valid 486 + spoilt 11 != cast 310; ward ballot valid 520 + spoilt 25 != cast 454; ward ballot valid 960 + spoilt 53 != cast 892. We report this rather than guess.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 45 voting districts with results so far here (6 906 of 18 154). The IEC publishes 39.3%.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 215 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (775); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (313); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 256 differs from the sum of party rows 425 by 169; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 480 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1416); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3439); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 79 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 295 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (889); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (352); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 299 differs from the sum of party rows 486 by 187; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 356 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1066); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 88 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (262); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 429 differs from the sum of party rows 520 by 91; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 414 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1203); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (465); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (307); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 97 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (282); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (195); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 839 differs from the sum of party rows 960 by 121; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (498); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (493); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (170); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (418); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (566); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 174 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (593); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (226); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (373); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1304); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (564); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 04:01 SAST.