ANC 62.3%
Leading on the DC 40% ballot so far (provisional)
- ANC 62.3%
- SACP 13.9%
- ATM 7.3%
- Others 16.5%
Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.
DC 40% ballot ? · 6 738 valid votes
ANCAfrican National Congress4 19762.3%- SACPSouth African Communist Party93913.9%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement4907.3%
DADemocratic Alliance3905.8%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters3465.1%
AICAfrican Independent Congress1492.2%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus701.0%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party590.9%- MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement460.7%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party240.4%
PAPatriotic Alliance190.3%- CIVICSterkspruit Civic Association90.1%
ESP app
How long is the queue?
Chat about the election in your area
ESP app
How did Elundini vote?
Get notified when it's declared
Hours off in Elundini ?
Reported in the ESP app
2000 Ward 2, Elundini in 2026 ?
No 2026 ward has the same boundary. These 2026 wards cover that area, each with its own results.
Wards · 17
- Ward 13 of 10 voting districts inANC 54.3%
- Ward 21 of 3 voting districts inANC 71.2%
- Ward 33 of 5 voting districts inANC 73.1%
- Ward 52 of 11 voting districts inANC 65.6%
- Ward 64 of 16 voting districts inANC 69.5%
- Ward 77 of 15 voting districts inANC 45.6%
- Ward 84 of 12 voting districts inANC 47.1%
- Ward 91 of 4 voting districts inMFCV 34.5%
- Ward 102 of 11 voting districts inANC 46.6%
- Ward 112 of 12 voting districts inANC 73.8%
- Ward 121 of 10 voting districts inIndependent 67.2%
- Ward 141 of 12 voting districts inATM 36.0%
- Ward 152 of 7 voting districts inANC 42.5%
- Ward 163 of 11 voting districts inANC 59.9%
- Ward 173 of 9 voting districts inDA 53.1%
- Ward 4Not in yet
- Ward 13Not in yet
On EskomSePush
ESP's own data, not the IEC's.
About these figures
Notes on the IEC's figures for this page
special votes 672 · 41 of 166 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)
In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.
Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 41 voting districts with results so far here (5 832 of 13 463). The IEC publishes 43.5%.
Note: IEC TotalValidVotes 16429 differs from the sum of party rows 19496 by 3067; we show per-ballot sums of party rows and do not publish the cross-ballot total.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (513); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (101); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 480 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1416); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 539 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1521); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 196 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (595); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 298 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (900); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 73 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 383 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1143); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 233 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (439); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (190); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (177); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (498); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 78 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 74 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 122 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (418); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 189 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (566); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (156); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (373); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (324); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 416 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1304); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (564); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (122); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1950: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1020: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (163); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.
Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.
Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.
Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.
IEC data last fetched 05 Nov 2026, 03:40 SAST.