Buffalo City

special votes 39 260 · All 380 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 380 voting districts here (253 325 of 458 695). The IEC publishes 55.6%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2313 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4637); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1464 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2883); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1271 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2545); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 427 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (828); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 113 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (231); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4357); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1747 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3518); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (214); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (133); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3049 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5953); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 929 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1917); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (476); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 121 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (235); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 106 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (245); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (108); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1994 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3765); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 941 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1830); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 452 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (942); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 268 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (442); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (459); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2740 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5546); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2387 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4796); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (490); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (346); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1341 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2732); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 980 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2059); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 910 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1825); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 680 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1340); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 346 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (553); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 161 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (323); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 40 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1368 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2776); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1365 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2828); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1052 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2053); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (488); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 242 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (431); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 99 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 37 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2640 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5260); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1801 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3637); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1009 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2010); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 708 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1422); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 286 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (648); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 59 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (126); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (91); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (82); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2047 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4081); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1711 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3474); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (445); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 147 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (284); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 118 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (106); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1753 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3404); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1722 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3401); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1705 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3501); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 870 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1846); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (255); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 96 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1481 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2896); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 963 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1927); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 421 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (951); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 231 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (434); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (157); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (81); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2777 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5430); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 945 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1984); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 391 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (776); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 92 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (117); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 38 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (75); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4936 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9689); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 305 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (633); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (599); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (502); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 87 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2314 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4565); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 700 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1364); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 512 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1027); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 311 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (702); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (286); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 89 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (182); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2063 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1139 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2371); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 213 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (437); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 101 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (205); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 70 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 67 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (78); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2502 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5046); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 661 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 502 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 437 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (783); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 140 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (293); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 63 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (83); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (74); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 24: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3240 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6441); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 808 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1546); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 404 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (831); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 274 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (635); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 252 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (498); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (152); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 26: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2026 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4089); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1129 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2283); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1128 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2135); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (206); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (171); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (62); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 27: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4526 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8789); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 520 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1078); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 421 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1025); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 270 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (576); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 130 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (258); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 117 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (247); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (131); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (73); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 28: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2814 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5451); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1031 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1579); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 218 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (283); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 200 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (305); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 104 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 86 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (76); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 30: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1771); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2551 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5009); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1297 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2578); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 733 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1525); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 552 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1029); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (280); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (213); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 94 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (113); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 31: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2581 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5145); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 930 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1835); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 477 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (912); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 208 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (385); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 116 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (224); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 46 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 33: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2491 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5032); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1052 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1130); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 199 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (341); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 191 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (335); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (308); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 166 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (303); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (67); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 35: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1383); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1843 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3636); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1390 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2862); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 906 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1768); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 245 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (499); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 143 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (278); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 95 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 82 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 65 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (69); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 37: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6478); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 461 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (906); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (689); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 153 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (297); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (200); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 38: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1960 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4040); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 980 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1975); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 500 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (867); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 254 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (506); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 238 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (470); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 75 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 40: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2332 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4658); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1295 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2627); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 266 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (539); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (168); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (65); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 42: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2073 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1246 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2238); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 456 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 287 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (538); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 239 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (494); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 68 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (137); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (84); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 43: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1769 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3600); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1062 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2232); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 872 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1713); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 787 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1747); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 601 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1208); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 119 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (257); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (193); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 84 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (140); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 57 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 3245: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (59); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 46: party 1968: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1923 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3860); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1478 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2884); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1194 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2346); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 190 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (407); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 109 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (266); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 90 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (176); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1544: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1755: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 2180: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1324: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1059: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 50: party 1579: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 07 Nov 2026, 16:04 SAST.